Vides aizsardz\u012bbas un re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s att\u012bst\u012bbas ministrs Juris P\u016bce (A\/P) izdevis r\u012bkojumu par Nila U\u0161akova (S) atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161anu no R\u012bgas domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja amata. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
L\u0113mumu par r\u012bkojuma izdo\u0161anu P\u016bce pie\u0146\u0113ma p\u0113c R\u012bgas dom\u0113 veikt\u0101s \njuridisk\u0101s p\u0101rbaudes, kur\u0101 atkl\u0101ja virkni iesp\u0113jamu U\u0161akova \nlikump\u0101rk\u0101pumu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
R\u012bkojum\u0101 P\u016bce pamato, ka U\u0161akova atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161ana ir \nnepiecie\u0161ama, lai ar vi\u0146a sod\u012b\u0161anu nodro\u0161in\u0101tu sabiedr\u012bbas intere\u0161u un \nties\u012bbu iev\u0113ro\u0161anu un rad\u012btu sabiedr\u012bb\u0101 apzi\u0146u, ka valsts aizsarg\u0101 \nindiv\u012bdu intereses un ties\u012bbas, veicina politisk\u0101s un tiesisk\u0101s kult\u016bras\n izaugsmi, personu atbild\u012bbas un tiesisk\u0101s k\u0101rt\u012bbas notur\u012bbu, k\u0101 ar\u012b \ntiek rea\u0123\u0113ts uz pie\u013cautiem tik b\u016btiskiem normat\u012bvo aktu p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Vienlaikus\n atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161ana ir nepiecie\u0161ama, lai nodro\u0161in\u0101tu R\u012bgas domes turpm\u0101ku \ntiesisku darb\u012bbu l\u0113mumu pie\u0146em\u0161an\u0101 un nepie\u013cautu turpm\u0101ku normat\u012bvo aktu\n p\u0101rk\u0101pumus un kompetento instit\u016bciju pras\u012bbu nepild\u012b\u0161anu, t\u0101d\u0113j\u0101di \nvairojot tiesisko nihilismu,” rakst\u012bts r\u012bkojum\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Pulksten 10 Vides\n aizsardz\u012bbas un re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s att\u012bst\u012bbas ministrij\u0101 (VARAM) notiks preses \nkonference, kur\u0101 P\u016bce s\u012bk\u0101k izkl\u0101st\u012bs sava l\u0113muma mot\u012bvus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No \namata atst\u0101din\u0101tais U\u0161akovs intervij\u0101 Latvijas Telev\u012bzijas raid\u012bjumam \n“R\u012bta panor\u0101ma” teica, ka P\u016bces izdotais r\u012bkojums ir prettiesisks, bet \ntaj\u0101 izmantotie argumenti ir b\u0113rnud\u0101rza l\u012bmen\u012b, neprofesion\u0101li un viegli\n atsp\u0113kojami ties\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Atlaist mani pilnv\u0113rt\u012bgi var v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ji vai tiesa,” teica U\u0161akovs, solot r\u012bkojumu p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113t ties\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ministra r\u012bkojums st\u0101jas sp\u0113k\u0101 l\u012bdz ar t\u0101 public\u0113\u0161anu ofici\u0101laj\u0101 izdevum\u0101 “Latvijas V\u0113stnesis”, t\u0101p\u0113c U\u0161akovs no amata pien\u0101kumu pild\u012b\u0161anas ir atst\u0101din\u0101ts no piektdienas, 5. apr\u012b\u013ca.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
U\u0161akovam ir 30 dienas v\u0113rsties ties\u0101 ar iesniegumu par VARAM r\u012bkojuma\n atcel\u0161anu. Ja m\u0113rs \u0161\u012bs ties\u012bbas neizmantos, vi\u0146\u0161 p\u0113c 30 dienu termi\u0146a \nizbeig\u0161an\u0101s uzskat\u0101ms par atlaistu. Ja tiesa noraida domes \npriek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja iesniegumu, domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101js uzskat\u0101ms par atlaistu \nar dienu, kad st\u0101jas sp\u0113k\u0101 tiesas spriedums.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Ja ar tiesas \nspriedumu VARAM r\u012bkojumu atcels, U\u0161akovs par laika posmu, kur\u0101 vi\u0146\u0161 bija\n atst\u0101din\u0101ts no amata pien\u0101kumu pild\u012b\u0161anas, sa\u0146ems domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja \nm\u0113ne\u0161algu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Likums ar\u012bdzan liedz atlaistu domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ju \natk\u0101rtoti iev\u0113l\u0113t par t\u0101 pa\u0161a sasaukuma priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ju. Ta\u010du ministra \nizdotais r\u012bkojums neliedz U\u0161akovam str\u0101d\u0101t par R\u012bgas domes ierindas \ndeput\u0101tu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
U\u0161akovs maij\u0101 kandid\u0113s Eiropas Parlamenta v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s. Ja \nvi\u0146u iev\u0113l\u0113s, r\u012bkojuma atcel\u0161ana neliks U\u0161akovam atgriezties R\u012bgas m\u0113ra \namat\u0101.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
R\u012bgas domes vad\u012bbu p\u0113c U\u0161akova ofici\u0101las \natst\u0101din\u0101\u0161anas p\u0101r\u0146ems abi vi\u0146a vietnieki \u2013 O\u013cegs Burovs (GKR) un Vadims\n Bara\u0146\u0146iks (S). Burovs iepriek\u0161 atkl\u0101ja, ka l\u012bdz jauna m\u0113ra iev\u0113l\u0113\u0161anai \nvi\u0146\u0161 pild\u012bs \u0161\u012b amata nestos pien\u0101kumus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
V\u0113st\u012bts, ka VARAM konstat\u0113jusi vair\u0101kus iesp\u0113jamus U\u0161akova pie\u013cautus likump\u0101rk\u0101pumus. Ministrija ir konstat\u0113jusi, ka “R\u012bgas satiksmes” kapit\u0101la da\u013cu tur\u0113t\u0101ja p\u0101rst\u0101vis U\u0161akovs nav nodro\u0161in\u0101jis uz\u0146\u0113muma pamatkapit\u0101la palielin\u0101\u0161anu t\u0101, k\u0101 to s\u0101kotn\u0113ji l\u0113musi R\u012bgas dome. T\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101, iesp\u0113jams, p\u0101rk\u0101pts Publiskas personas kapit\u0101la da\u013cu un kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbu p\u0101rvald\u012bbas likums, kas paredz, ka pamatkapit\u0101lu dr\u012bkst palielin\u0101t vai samazin\u0101t tikai, pamatojoties uz dal\u012bbnieku sapulces l\u0113mumu, kur\u0101 iek\u013cauti pamatkapit\u0101la palielin\u0101\u0161anas vai samazin\u0101\u0161anas noteikumi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“R\u012bgas satiksme” pa\u0161vald\u012bbas pie\u0161\u0137irtos \nl\u012bdzek\u013cus finan\u0161u ieguld\u012bjumam iek\u013c\u0101vusi ie\u0146\u0113mumos, nesedzot sabiedr\u012bbas\n zaud\u0113jumus. Ministrija pau\u017e ba\u017eas, ka t\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 prettiesiski var\u0113tu \nb\u016bt samazin\u0101ta pa\u0161vald\u012bbas manta.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
VARAM uzskaita ar\u012b vair\u0101kus \ncitus iesp\u0113jamos p\u0101rk\u0101pumus. Piem\u0113ram, U\u0161akovs var\u0113tu b\u016bt p\u0101rk\u0101pis \nPubliskas personas kapit\u0101la da\u013cu un kapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbu p\u0101rvald\u012bbas \nlikumu, jo nav izdar\u012bjis attiec\u012bgus groz\u012bjumus “R\u012bgas satiksmes” \nstat\u016btos, lai k\u0101 krietns un r\u016bp\u012bgs saimnieks izv\u0113rt\u0113tu dar\u012bjumu \nsl\u0113g\u0161anu, kas p\u0101rsniedz noteiktu summu un var iz\u0161\u0137iro\u0161i ietekm\u0113t \nkapit\u0101lsabiedr\u012bbas darb\u012bbu. Kopum\u0101 VARAM konstat\u0113ja 12 iesp\u0113jamus \np\u0101rk\u0101pumus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
U\u0161akovs paskaidrojumus ministrijai pag\u0101ju\u0161aj\u0101 ceturtdien\u0101, 28. mart\u0101, nos\u016bt\u012bja pa pastu. M\u0113rs uzskata, ka ministra P\u016bces sagatavotais piepras\u012bjums sniegt paskaidrojumus par SIA “R\u012bgas satiksme” un domes darbu bija juridiski v\u0101j\u0161 un politiz\u0113ts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
M\u0113rs nor\u0101d\u012bja, ka nebija gaid\u012bjis, ka P\u016bces v\u0113stule b\u016b\u0161ot tik v\u0101ja, un ka uz t\u0101s pamata notiks m\u0113\u0123in\u0101jumi t\u0101l\u0101k lemt par vi\u0146a atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161anu. U\u0161akovs ar\u012b sac\u012bja, ka ministrs vair\u0101kk\u0101rt publiski paudis viedokli, ka v\u0113rt\u0113ts tiekot pa\u0161reiz\u0113j\u0101 sasaukuma darbs, ta\u010du piepras\u012bjum\u0101 esot vair\u0101ki jaut\u0101jumi ar\u012b par iepriek\u0161\u0113jo sasaukumu darbu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
“Es nek\u0101d\u0101 veid\u0101 netaisos atteikties no atbild\u012bbas par izdar\u012bto no 2009. gada, bet, ja m\u0113s run\u0101jam par to, ka ministrs ir ties\u012bgs lemt par r\u012bc\u012bbu tikai \u0161\u012b sasaukuma laik\u0101, tad k\u0101d\u0113\u013c tiek pras\u012bts par 2013. gada un 2016. gada notikumiem,” ironiz\u0113ja m\u0113rs. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Vides aizsardz\u012bbas un re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s att\u012bst\u012bbas ministrs Juris P\u016bce (A\/P) izdevis r\u012bkojumu par Nila U\u0161akova (S) atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161anu no R\u012bgas domes priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja amata. L\u0113mumu par r\u012bkojuma izdo\u0161anu P\u016bce pie\u0146\u0113ma p\u0113c R\u012bgas dom\u0113 veikt\u0101s juridisk\u0101s p\u0101rbaudes, kur\u0101 atkl\u0101ja virkni iesp\u0113jamu U\u0161akova likump\u0101rk\u0101pumu. R\u012bkojum\u0101 P\u016bce pamato, ka U\u0161akova atst\u0101din\u0101\u0161ana ir nepiecie\u0161ama, lai ar vi\u0146a sod\u012b\u0161anu nodro\u0161in\u0101tu sabiedr\u012bbas intere\u0161u un … <\/p>\n